The Second Conservative Wave in Latin America
Social movements, far-right governance, and the politics of resistance — 2025–2026
Organized by Dr. Tina Hilgers (Lab for Latin American & Caribbean Studies, Concordia University) — whose research on clientelism, violence, and subnational politics anchors its comparative approach — this three-day seminar brings together researchers, practitioners, and students to examine the political geography of the "second conservative wave" in Latin America. From Milei's libertarian shock therapy in Argentina to Kast's hard-right victory in Chile, from Bukele's security state in El Salvador to Noboa's re-election in Ecuador, the seminar traces both the drivers of this wave and the social movements adapting to contest it.
Each day focuses on a distinct analytical lens: Day 1 maps the terrain of the new right across the region. Day 2 examines social movement responses — feminist organizing, digital solidarity networks, legal counter-strategies. Day 3 turns to futures — elections in Brazil, Colombia, and Peru; the durability of conservative coalitions; and the role of transnational academic solidarity.
9:45
10:30
10:45
11:30
12:15
13:30
14:30
16:00
17:00
9:45
10:30
10:45
11:30
12:15
13:30
14:30
16:00
17:00
9:45
10:30
10:45
11:30
12:15
13:30
15:00
16:00
The Second Conservative Wave — Guest Map
Researchers, specialists, and practitioners with published work directly relevant to the seminar's themes — mapped by axis, feasibility, and strategic value. Seminar organized by Dr. Tina Hilgers (LLACS).
Invitation strategy
Build outward from Montréal. Canada-based scholars (green) are the highest-feasibility invitations — no travel cost, same funding ecosystem, and several have direct Latin American research ties. Confirm 4–6 of these first to give the seminar a guaranteed core.
Use Zoom strategically for Latin America-based anchors. The region's leading voices on the new right — Rovira Kaltwasser, Vommaro, Gago, Stefanoni — are realistic Zoom guests for a single session, especially when invited to discuss already-published work rather than produce something new.
One anchor per day. A single high-profile name per day (keynote slot) is enough to draw attendance and signal seriousness. The rest of each day works better with a mix of regional specialists and emerging scholars who actively want the exposure.
Match the Day 2 public lecture to its topic. The program's evening event — "From Pinochet to Kast: 50 Years of the Chilean Right" — needs a Chile specialist: Verónica Schild, Carlos Meléndez, or Rovira Kaltwasser are the natural fits. El Faro / Carlos Dada is a superb public draw too, but on press freedom and the El Salvador case (Day 1), not the Chilean lecture.
The field-defining scholars on far-right ideology, populism, and the comparative politics of the conservative wave — who can frame the seminar's central questions.
Researchers with deep, published country expertise on the specific administrations at the centre of the seminar: Milei, Kast, Bukele, Noboa, Paz, and the 2026 Peruvian race.
Scholars and scholar-activists on feminist organizing, anti-gender politics, and movement adaptation — the heart of Day 2.
The axis closest to LLACS's existing research strengths — labour informality, domestic work, and austerity. Internal anchors plus complementary external voices.
The Trump Corollary, hemispheric realignment, and diaspora politics — including the Montréal connection.
Non-academic voices who give the seminar grounding, audience reach, and the practitioner perspective the program promises — including candidates for the Day 2 public event.

